Sex, Lies, and HGH: Another Look at Tiger Woods

by Stephen Altschuler on January 28, 2013

It is interesting how the golf world tiptoes, still, around Tiger Woods and his alleged use of performance enhancing drugs. All the evidence says he did, but few in the  media, that is so dependent on Woods for its jobs, have the guts to dig into it and investigate what we do know. That kind of nosing around is needed to find the truth. We’ve just seen Barry Bonds, who never admitted using steroids, rejected by the Hall of Fame because of moral considerations around his evident use of steroids. What other reason did they have to reject a man who hit as many home runs as he did? We’ve just seen Lance Armstrong admit to Oprah Winfrey he used PEDs and other illegal procedures, after years of denials and bullying others who dared to challenge his assertions. In the course of a few years, Tiger’s body went from skinny teen to NFL-ready. Was this just from an exercise/diet routine? I don’t think so. Could this have been an HGH-fueled regime? The doctor he worked with for his knee restoration was Anthony Galea MD, who was tried and convicted of smuggling PEDs, including HGH, into the United States. Galea was deported back to Canada, and must get specific permission from the Department of Homeland Security to reenter this country. Woods says he did not receive HGH from Galea, only a legal blood spinning procedure to speed the healing of his knee, a procedure for which there were any number of American doctors he could have used. Has Woods told the truth about what he received from Galea? I think not. Since his sex scandal, he has shown an obvious propensity for lying. In fact, it is known that HGH heightens the sex drive, and Tiger’s sexual appetite was monumental, as we know for a fact–even to the point of having to enter a treatment program to deal with his “sex addiction.” Where did that addiction originate? It’s obvious: It came from taking HGH. And where did it lead to? It led to his sleeping with a prostitute while his wife was pregnant, and subsequent divorce and separation from his children. As far as golf was concerned, after he won his last major on a broken leg in 2008, PGA drug testing started around that time, and Tiger conveniently chose to leave the tour that July to treat his knee possibly in order to avoid those random tests. When he returned, his legendary skills with the putter had diminished, which prevented him from winning any tournaments for three years, and now entering his fifth season since winning a major. Did the use of HGH affect his putting skills? What else could it have been? He was the best putter since Tom Morris Jr.

Now we hear from the same source that broke the sex scandal–the National Enquirer–that Woods has offered 200 million to his ex-wife to remarry him. He is obviously struggling with the single life. He is desperate because an avowed sex addict (a short stint in rehab does not cure this affliction) who cannot satisfy his sex drive is a tortured man. So he turns to a woman whom he betrayed, and whom he probably doesn’t love. The thing is his ex-wife once struck him in the face with a golf club as he ran from his house after she discovered provocative emails to and from another woman, then smashed a rear window in his car with that same club as he erratically drove away, slamming into a fire hydrant on a neighbor’s lawn. When the police arrived, he lay on the ground, bleeding and groaning. The police went to his house in the days that followed, but Woods wouldn’t cooperate. A few days later, he flew to Arizona to have a plastic surgeon remold his face so no one would know what his wife had done. Now he’s asking her to remarry, providing she agrees to a pre-nuptial arrangement involving 200 million dollars. Frankly, I’ve never heard of anyone, let alone the most famous golfer in the world, doing this. Is he under so much scrutiny that he hasn’t been in bed with anyone since his last romp with a prostitute? If so, for a sex addict, this would be agonizing. But buying back his ex-wife? Again, only an addict would think of this. Drug users make bad decisions. As a mental health counselor, I’ve worked with them for over 40 years. They don’t think things through rationally before making decisions. They stumble. They’re impulsive. They hurt people, usually psycho-socially, but that is often more harmful than any kind of physical violence. I suspect Tiger doesn’t re-love Elin, but needs her to satisfy his addiction. I would advise Elin to turn down his offer and move on with her life. She doesn’t need to ingratiate herself again with Tiger Woods.

Some will vilify me and call me a Tiger hater. I don’t hate Tiger. (Hey, I’ve promoted his app elsewhere) But I do love the game of golf. And, for the sake of golf, the spotlight needs still to be on Woods and the facts as we know them. Do I have proof that he used illegal performance enhancing drugs? No, I don’t. But Woods, like Lance, has forced me into a position of supposition, since he hasn’t told the truth, evading questions (or not even being asked anymore) with stonewall answers. But the higher the stone wall goes, the more suspicious it makes me, and should make you. In fact, the more he continues to win, the more the sense of urgency that we need to know if it’s all legitimate.

We live in a cult of personality, with sport celebrities surrounded by a wall of lies. Barry Bonds. Alex Rodriguez. OJ Simpson. Lance Armstrong. Pete Rose. Mark McGuire. Sammy Sosa. Liars, all. The list is shocking and revealing. Because of our one-time reverence of these figures, we are reluctant to tug at any loose threads for fear the embroidery will unravel, destroying the false images we had built of these people. We are a society of inferiority complexes and weak egos. The San Francisco Chronicle, in an editorial entitled “Tales of illusion and delusion,” about Lance Armstrong and college football star, Manti Te’o who fabricated an online girlfriend and her tragic story, concluded this about our society: “The Armstrong and Te’o episodes offer further cautionary notes about the fallibility of the narratives that elevate and ultimately define celebrities in a culture that worships them. It would be nice to think we won’t get fooled again. The smart money–the big money that tempts and nurtures these mythologies–says we will.”

We are an insecure and adolescent society that is easily duped by false prophets and heroes, by religions relying on fear and espousing fairy tales, and delusional exhortations of having a gun in every home and school room. So we sit in front of our TVs watching Tiger Woods win 14 majors, and rationalize our reluctance to hold him accountable for his behavior beyond golf. Woods tells us to back off from “my private life” but he really doesn’t have a private life, just as a Hollywood star doesn’t have a private life. It’s one of the sacrifices he must make for his fame. Stewart Cink has a private life. Tiger Woods does not. For golfers, he’s an icon who transformed golf into a power game, into a big money game. We never fully took him into our hearts because he never really let us. But, in a sense, he’s family, however dysfunctional, and we want to know what he’s doing behind closed doors. We are not rude voyeurs. We simply hold him to a higher standard and want to know if he’s meeting his public responsibilities, being a positive role model for our children, and keeping the moral bar high. But, despite our trust in him that he would honor golf with impeccable behavior off the course, he did not do so.

So, like Sherlock Holmes, we need to search for the truth if it is being hidden. We need to skulk about in the mud looking for footprints that many have noticed but have pretended not to see. We need to deduce, and analyze those deductions, with reason, until…until the perpetrator comes clean. For if the truth stays hidden, golf will suffer, and golf has given us so much. Eventually, Lance crumbled under such public scrutiny. So might Tiger.

Did Tiger Woods use Performance Enhancing Drugs, helping him win more majors and achieve his obsessive goals? Based on the evidence out there and stated above, I think so. I will continue to poke around in the mud for more footprints and dropped cufflinks, until the truth be known.

So why do I pursue Woods like this? Why not just let the man be, and let bygones be bygones? He’s human. Humans err, and life goes on. It’s just every time I see this guy being interviewed, and see his sullen, suspicious demeanor, I do not trust that he has protected the sacred trust golf has given him. He has developed into this amazing golfer, perhaps the best in history, but has it been done honestly? I have doubts about the honesty of his efforts. And where the integrity of the game is concerned, any doubt must be explored, no matter where it might lead. A close investigation of Woods might harm the game, but no real investigation could harm the game even more. That is the point we are presently at. There is too much doubt around how he developed his enormous talents and his awe inspiring record of wins.

As with most indiscretions or crimes involving public figures, the public suffers from denial, and is often too willing to move on without fully knowing the truth. And without knowing the truth, there is left a film of mold on the public memory–a film that clouds and distorts that memory over time. A most obvious example is JFK’s assassination. This country is still depressed over that since we never got to the full truth of the crime, nor do we even know if it was a lone gunman who did it. If nothing else, golf is a sport that depends on the integrity of its players and the trust fans have in the validity of its history. It is truly a sport of honor, and the evasive, secretive answers Woods has given to valid questions not only does not honor the sport, it erodes that honor. Woods is much like Lance Armstrong: arrogant, bullying, denying fault, intimidating to all who challenge him, deceiving, ambitious, obsessive, insulated by his entourage, rich, empowered by an icon status. But golf is much different than cycling: It is more than one’s proficiency at hitting a little ball into a far away hole. It has also to do with how one deports oneself on the course and in the more important game of life. The veil of cheating hangs heavy on professional golfers–even just a wisp of that veil. Woods has done far from enough to help lift that veil. We expect more of professional golfers, particularly Woods who has conquered so many of its records, and is on the verge of capturing, arguably, its most significant prize: total number of majors won. We fans have a right to know if Woods is legitimate. All of golf has a right to continue to examine, for the sake of the integrity of the game–that keystone that holds the arch of the sport intact–the fallibility of his narrative.

 

Twitter 0
Facebook 0
StumbleUpon 0
Share

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

richard January 28, 2013 at 8:16 am

Very good writing Stephen. Your passion about this topic is very evident. I find it interesting that a professional golfer will call a penalty on themself if something happens that nobody else sees. If they touch a twig in a hazard with their back swing, if the ball moves imperceptibly on the down swing, if they ground their club in a bunker, and on and on through all the rules that we all hold ourselves up to. But does Tiger or any other golfer trying to improve his performance illegally call a penalty? No. And this isn’t the first time with illegal substances. Remember the flap over Mac O’Grady’s assertion that golfers took beta blockers to help calm their putting nerves.

Reply

Stephen Altschuler January 28, 2013 at 1:40 pm

Thanks very much, Richard. It’s true, I do feel passion around this subject, now that you mention it. I want to play my bit in upholding the honor and integrity of golf. I want to make sure Woods and what he’s accomplished are legitimate. Given the doubts out there, and there are a lot of doubters, this is critical to the game and its history. Let’s hope the full truth is eventually revealed.
I do remember O’Grady’s assertion about beta blockers.
We need others to step forward in this era, as well.

Reply

Troy Vayanos February 1, 2013 at 9:04 pm

I still wonder Stephen what benefit PED have for modern day golfers. The only ones that seem to be any benefit are beta-blockers because they slow down your heart rate and can help when the pressure is on.

Golf is a sport based on fluid motions and a high degree of skill that most illegal drugs might not influence.

I hope for Tiger’s sake he has achieved success the clean way or else we’re going to have golf in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons.

Cheers

Reply

Stephen Altschuler February 2, 2013 at 10:29 am

You make a good point, Troy. There are many aspects of golf that are beyond any benefit PEDs could afford. But on the pro level, distance off the tee is a tremendous advantage towards the one thing that separates the winners from the losers: making birdies. Whether it’s myth or reality, the performance the pros might want to enhance is distance off the tee. As I’ve mentioned before, more distance off the tee leads to less club to the green leads to shorter birdie putts leads to more birdies leads to more wins. Perception has it that club speed will increase with more muscle and core power. I believe Tiger could well have perceived this to be the case in making his decisions around PEDs.
Thanks for weighing in with your comments.

Reply

Marcel White March 4, 2013 at 5:57 am

Great post Stephen.

“Some will vilify me and call me a Tiger hater” and, I add, some will perhaps stop visiting your blog. Sacrificing your ratings to defend your ideas deserves our respect. I’ll keep coming back. More often than before. Thanks.

Reply

Stephen Altschuler March 4, 2013 at 9:59 pm

Thanks so much, Marcel. Your support means a great deal to me. The truth will emerge if enough people question the discrepancies.
Bowing deeply.

Reply

Mike Tanner March 11, 2013 at 3:11 pm

Great writing. I live in Orlando and have been a member at Golds gym for years where Tiger was a member, shocking but true, turkey lake rd, very true. Saw him pre us open, big, strong, and after the knee damage, a shrunken skinny shell of himself. It’s not hard to see a guy who does things that no one’s ever seen before to hitting a pop up of 180 yards.

Reply

Stephen Altschuler March 12, 2013 at 9:28 pm

This is a very interesting comment, Mike. Thank you for writing and sharing you’re first hand experience around Tiger Woods who belonged to the same gym as you at one time. If I’m clear on this, you’re saying you yourself observed Tiger Woods change to “a shrunken skinny shell of himself” after his knee damage after the ’08 Open. As we see Woods now, completely buffed out and his body transformed, it would have been near impossible to accomplish that with just free weights. Again, here is more evidence that HGH could well have been involved in his rehabilitation.

Reply

Josh March 13, 2013 at 3:49 pm

Stephen, you seem to take some big leaps of faith in this article. You “suspect” a lot of things and are purely looking for things that might lead you to an answer you are looking for. I can personally tell you that I didn’t start packing on “mature” muscle until I was in my mid-20′s, without even changing my diet or excercise routine. I was a late bloomer, so to speak. If I worked out as hard as Tiger, I’d bulk up now too. Do you forget that he won the Masters by 12 shots as a “scronny” little boy? How about his dominance as an amatuer when he was a twig? What does bulking up have to do with putting? Or chipping? Or hitting a soft knock down 3/4 pitching wedge? His work ethic is second to none, including in the gym. Even though he won the Masters by 12 he probably wanted to win the next one by 15. Then he won the US Open by 15 strokes 3 years later in a ‘slightly’ more masculine frame as he started to hit the weights and it progressed over the years. It didn’t happen overnight, give it a shot and you’d be amazed how your body will transform. Get over it and stick to more relevant posts that don’t exude jealousy and resentment to one of the best that has ever lived. Everyone deserves a personal life, our twisted society has given us a sense of entitlement into these people’s lives, but it’s purely manufactured by the media who have a vested interest in making us think we have the right to know. You have some decent posts, but this one is useless.

Reply

Stephen Altschuler March 13, 2013 at 9:10 pm

Thanks for your comments, Josh. I do understand what you’re saying, and think you make good points. I guess my posts around all this are more to protect the honor of the game than to bring Tiger down. I don’t trust the guy, based on what I’ve seen him do and heard him say. I don’t trust this Canadian doctor who treated him and was banned from the country. It’s just that some things don’t add up. True, he didn’t bulk up to putt or chip better. He’s a great player, perhaps the greatest ever. As you point out he didn’t need muscle to win his first major. Then why did he bulk up? As a blogger, I think I can ask such questions and “suspect” anything I wish. I’m looking for the truth, since I don’t think the whole story has been revealed. I now think the bulking up was a side effect of needing to heal faster after his knee surgery. I think he used HGH as a healing agent, not to play better golf. The Canadian doctor had a bag of such agents when he stopped by Tiger’s place after his surgery. Faster healing was the motivation. Is he still using the stuff? No. But I think he did, and stayed off the tour until it was out of his system. If so, that was illegal, and puts a deep stain on the game. If not, I’m wrong. Either way, I’d like to know what’s true.
I’m not jealous or resentful of Woods. I just “suspect” he used an illegal substance to get back to a place where he could pursue his goals. Of course, being stronger does help him drive it farther, which gets him closer to the green, which helps him get more birdies, which helps him win more. And win more he will. This guy could win the Grand Slam this year the way his game is dialed in.
Anyway, your comments have helped me get clearer on my thoughts about all this. I’m not “over it” yet, but don’t worry, I won’t obsess too much on this issue.

Reply

Josh March 18, 2013 at 4:01 pm

Thanks for the thoughtful reply, Stephen. You’re a good writer, and you are correct when you say you have every right as a blogger/fan to suspect things, or at the very least throw them out there for discussion. I was just trying to play devil’s advocate and give a different perspective on one of the greatest to ever live, so I apologize if I sounded a bit harsh. Regardless of what the truth is, he’s a darn exciting guy to watch out there, and with 2 wins already this season anything is possible if he hits and putts it like he did at Doral! Albeit, those are easy greens to putt on by tour standards…the real test will be when he gets on those Augusta greens :)

Keep on keepin on….

Josh

Reply

Stephen Altschuler March 21, 2013 at 9:09 pm

Apology accepted, Josh. But really anything that keeps me honest and makes me think about and consider something I’ve written is appreciated. And your note did make me think about Tiger’s motivation. Tiger is playing some of his best golf now, and we are fortunate to witness this legend, as I was fortunate to witness first hand Nicklaus, Palmer, and Player back in the day. I’m sure Woods has inspired many to take up this game, and his contributions should be honored. Whatever the truth is about his using steroids, he is, arguably, the greatest player to ever play this game, and that’s no lie.
Thanks very much, Josh, for your clarifying comments.

Reply

BW May 12, 2013 at 6:31 am

So the use of HGH helps with putting? That’s news to me. There is nothing that being bigger and stronger would do to make you a better putter. This article is based in speculation and revolves around actual events that took place (having to leave tour becuase of his leg) to try and explain something that no one has any real proof happened. By the way, he won 8 majors between 1997 and 2002, at that time he was nowhere near as bulked up as he is now, so that also deflates your argument big time. If anything you could make the argument that he has struggled more after he got big other than 2005-06. He was one of the longest drivers on tour in 1997 when he was skinny as a stick. If you look at the facts over time, it is also highly plausible that he did nothing wrong in the way of using HGH. We will probably never know if he did or not, but to blatantly twist facts to fit an argument while ignoring the things that shoot it down is wrong.

Reply

Stephen Altschuler May 12, 2013 at 8:19 am

No, HGH doesn’t help putting. In fact, it may actually hurt putting, which may account for Tiger’s poor putting (by his standards) during the last few seasons. HGH helps an athlete to heal faster and get back into the game faster, which is why I suspect Tiger used it in relation to his knee surgeries after the 2008 U.S. Open. It might also account for his erratic and reckless behavior surrounding the sex scandal and subsequent divorce. Tiger showed he can lie like Lance during that scandal, something prosecutors use to prove their point and convince the jury of the guilt of the accused. I’m not twisting the facts: I’m stating what is known, what is observable, and asserting the possibilities. Now, it’s up to you, the jury.
Thanks very much for your comments, Mr. or Ms. defense attorney.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: